|Developer Diary · You Heard It Here First · 4 December 2003
|Microsoft's Absurd FAT Patents
As can be seen on the link below Microsoft is proposing to force license FAT, it's persistent storage format. FAT itself cannot be patented because it was made public a year before Microsoft bought it in 1981. Therefore they are claiming the various patents on long-to-short file name systems that can be used on a FAT disk. Links to each of these patents is provided below:
Method and system for accessing a file using file names having different file name formats filed 1992, granted 1998
This is really absurd. If you read the first three patents, their substance is that you can store long filenames alongside short ones and maintain a link between the two. If the person supplies a long filename you can abbreviate it to a unique string (like "abc-1.exe", "abc-2.exe" etc) in order to create the short file name for the older part of the system. You have to wonder why the patent clerk doesn't consider these ideas to be completely obvious. You don't have to be a computer programmer to see that these ideas are obvious.
The last patent, granted in 2001, really takes the cake. In this patent Microsoft claims its entire drive access API complete with register flags and interrupts along with more minutia concerning long file names. It's kind of ironic that Microsoft is claiming patents in an area where their whole system has long been seen as being particularly defective. The whole long filename thing is only necessary because of the poor design of the original operating system. I guess now obvious ad hoc hacks to fix it qualify as brilliant innovations deserving of patents.
Supporting long filenames, the obvious and natural thing to do, has been around at least as early as 1977 (BSD Unix) and even if it had not it is hard to see how having a long filename is an innovation. Just because memory limitations discouraged using long file names in the early days of computers does not mean it is not an obvious idea. It is too bad that the patent office's policy of granting weak patents and letting the courts hash it out (at great expense) is having effects like this which hurt everybody.
|Developer Diary · email@example.com · bio · Revised 4 December 2003 · Pure Content